Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-05-26 21:45:41
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xtNYi2RdKxqZJFAPi8cm-_2gqb0LyU+oUYoMu810LEEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:

> On 2017-05-26 08:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> On 26 May 2017 at 07:10, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>
>> - Do you agree this number of failures is far too high?
>>> - Am I the only one finding so many failures?
>>>
>>
>> What type of failure are you getting?
>>
>
> The failure is that in the result state the replicated tables differ from
> the original tables.
>

But what is the actual failure? Which tables differ? Do they have the
same number of rows? Do they only differ in the *balance column or
something else? Are they transactionally consistent?

I have not been able to replicate the problem.

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-05-26 21:48:34 Re: Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules
Previous Message Kha Nguyen 2017-05-26 21:09:37 Re: Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules