On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
>
> My $0.01:
>
> While I sympathize with Noah's sentiments, the only thing that makes sense
> to me is that a JSON text field is treated the same way as we treat text.
> Right now, that means NUL is not allowed, period.
>
> If no one has bitched about this with text, is it really that big a
> problem with JSON?
I would bitch about it for text if I thought that it would do any good.