Re: Different memory allocation strategy in Postgres 11?

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Different memory allocation strategy in Postgres 11?
Date: 2018-10-26 15:42:59
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xedG=UBiUXtR+XMgeKdtep=9DxyOgWVMjW7QXFP3yP6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 9:12 AM Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> I have a Postgres instance running on my Windows laptop for testing
> purposes.
>
> I typically configure "shared_buffers = 4096MB" on my 16GB system as
> sometimes when testing, it pays off to have a bigger cache.
>
> With Postgres 10 and earlier, the Postgres process(es) would only allocate
> that memory from the operating system when needed.
> So right after startup, it would only consume several hundred MB, not the
> entire 4GB
>
> However with Postgres 11 I noticed that it immediately grabs the complete
> memory configured for shared_buffers during startup.
>
> It's not really a big deal, but I wonder if that is an intentional change
> or a result from something else?
>

Do you have pg_prewarm in shared_preload_libraries?

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2018-10-26 15:59:17 Re: GIN Index for low cardinality
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2018-10-26 14:54:37 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?