Re: GiST kNN search queue (Re: KNN-GiST with recheck)

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST kNN search queue (Re: KNN-GiST with recheck)
Date: 2014-12-15 21:59:58
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xTWjb9bfBOHrmJ7YOVwT4kXEEnX=d8Qa81kPK98WUnaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
> wrote:

Here's a new version of the patch. It now uses the same pairing heap code
> that I posted in the other thread ("advance local xmin more aggressivley",
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5488ACF0.8050901@vmware.com). The
> pairingheap_remove() function is unused in this patch, but it is needed by
> that other patch.

Under enable-cassert, this tries to call pairingheap_empty, but that
function doesn't exist.

I looked in the other patch and didn't find it defined there, either.

cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2014-12-15 23:27:28 Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2014-12-15 21:58:32 Re: Minor binary-search int overflow in timezone code