Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?
Date: 2017-04-26 15:40:35
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xM9qPo=znyXtzrLCsu=0kg2QwqxJR_iS=waJTj5RJPBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 4/25/17 15:42, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> >> Here is the patch doing just that.
> >
> > And one more revision which also checks in_use when attaching shared
> > memory. This is mainly to improve the user visible behavior in
> > theoretical corner case when the worker is supposed to be cleaned up but
> > actually still manages to start (it would still fail even without this
> > change but the error message would be more obscure).
>
> Committed that, with some editorializing.
>

This gives me compiler warning:

launcher.c: In function 'logicalrep_worker_launch':
launcher.c:257: warning: 'slot' may be used uninitialized in this function

gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-18) (GCC)

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-26 15:42:38 Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-04-26 15:39:44 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort