| From: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Cocco Gianfranco <Gianfranco(dot)Cocco(at)eng(dot)it>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, DBA <DBA(at)italiaonline(dot)it> |
| Subject: | Re: Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| Date: | 2017-06-12 17:27:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAMkU=1wWV=3MMpncboYjXkVQqXrk6Dnukj-57h=LyiLnWE=zHA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Cocco Gianfranco
> <Gianfranco(dot)Cocco(at)eng(dot)it> wrote:
> > Is there a way to fix “wal_segsize” to about 1 Gb in 9.2. version, and
> “rebuild” postgreSQL server?
>
> As long as you are able to compile your own version of Postgres and
> your distribution does not allow that, there is nothing preventing you
> to do so.
>
But there is something preventing it. wal_segsize cannot exceed 64MB in
9.2. v10 will be the first version which will allow sizes above 64MB.
Cheers,
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-12 21:25:57 | Re: Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| Previous Message | Neil Anderson | 2017-06-12 16:24:07 | Re: BUG #14701: pg_dump fails to dump pg_catalog schema |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-12 21:25:57 | Re: Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-06-11 12:36:48 | Re: Improving PostgreSQL insert performance |