Re: Vacuum Full - Questions

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum Full - Questions
Date: 2016-08-31 23:24:05
Message-ID: CAMjNa7dd1WmgMkp-fMbNtyMm9dDot_7_++pPnGrT+SrANWUWew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes that very well could happen because the size of the table changed, as
well as stats being more accurate now. Just because you have a seq scan
doesn't mean the planer is making a bad choice.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Venkata B Nagothi 2016-08-31 23:53:38 Re: Vacuum Full - Questions
Previous Message Nicolas Grilly 2016-08-31 22:52:41 Re: Clustered index to preserve data locality in a multitenant application?