Re: Postgres with pthread

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres with pthread
Date: 2017-12-06 17:24:19
Message-ID: CAMjNa7cyLaTJC7aj5QyEJjk1CZF5MU53ge9yLpe8FO4hAZycVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "barely a 50% speedup" - Hah. I don't believe the numbers, but that'd be
> huge.
They are numbers derived from a benchmark that any sane person would
be using a connection pool for in a production environment, but
impressive if true none the less.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-12-06 17:26:58 Re: Postgres with pthread
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-12-06 17:22:42 Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions