Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2016-11-02 21:09:04
Message-ID: CAMjNa7cSy5hennr8uk2pkSKQqUGNS5FHWyDXW-3OsGwh3ur4CQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> There may be some situations where crawling the indexes a row at a
> time will perform better than this by enough to want to retain that
> option.

If an index existed, wouldn't it still be able to use that in the set-based
implementation? Is there something which would make doing the check
set-based ever worse than row based inherently?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-11-02 22:56:37 Re: plan_rows confusion with parallel queries
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-02 21:05:40 Re: WAL consistency check facility