Re: A problem about ParamPathInfo for an AppendPath

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A problem about ParamPathInfo for an AppendPath
Date: 2023-03-17 03:19:15
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_d+fOFtdu+0_kfAr5xezfXCOnoejc8S4_oaBgmy21ZQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:15 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Pushed. I thought the comment needed to be completely rewritten not just
> tweaked, and I felt it was probably reasonable to continue to exclude
> dummy paths from getting the more expensive treatment.

Yes agreed. Thanks for the changes and pushing.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-03-17 03:49:14 Re: Simplify some codes in pgoutput
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-03-17 03:14:56 Re: gcc 13 warnings