Re: Don't use bms_membership in places where it's not needed

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Don't use bms_membership in places where it's not needed
Date: 2023-11-24 06:53:50
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_bjaex6RSFAHHJoUsHUv_V76wr6SFKW7NkBVKgbfcQvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:06 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> In the attached, I've adjusted the code to use the latter of the two
> above methods in 3 places. In examine_variable() this reduces the
> complexity of the logic quite a bit and saves calling bms_is_member()
> in addition to bms_singleton_member().

+1 to the idea.

I think you have a typo in distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels. We should
remove the call of bms_singleton_member and use relid instead.

--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
@@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(PlannerInfo *root,
* There is only one relation participating in the clause, so it
* is a restriction clause for that relation.
*/
- rel = find_base_rel(root, bms_singleton_member(relids));
+ rel = find_base_rel(root, relid);

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Давыдов Виталий 2023-11-24 07:10:17 Re: How to accurately determine when a relation should use local buffers?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-11-24 05:45:06 Re: [PATCH] fix race condition in libpq (related to ssl connections)