Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean
Date: 2023-03-20 08:04:31
Message-ID: CAMbWs4__mNPZWS3x-BZQ+E6yGpz_HESG8GPWSUQ__dZ4Wg6LZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:49 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> > On 20 Mar 2023, at 08:46, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
> > and make that simpler? I would propose:
> > "For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
> > functions."
>
> Yes please, keeping such counts in sync is always error-prone.

Agreed. +1 to remove the counts.

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-03-20 08:05:41 About a recently-added permission-related error message
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-03-20 07:49:25 Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean