| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor> |
| Date: | 2026-04-24 12:04:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs4_CL1RE9dhYaG0aurmMawE5ectQzM52nVOY7UKyZ+6f2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 3:51 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 09:55:10AM +0900, Richard Guo wrote:
> > Not sure the RMT mailing list works or not, maybe I'd better CC RMT
> > members.
> The mailing list you have attached is used every year by the RMT
> members for their internal discussions, attaching it to a
> pgsql-hackers or pgsql-bugs thread is not the usual practice, so I
> would suggest to avoid that in the future. Adding the RMT members
> directly in CC is enough if input is required for an open item.
Thanks for the information. Will avoid that in the future. Since the
RMT members are already in CC, I'll wait for their feedback.
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-04-24 12:44:04 | Re: to_date()/to_timestamp() silently accept month=0 and day=0 |
| Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2026-04-24 11:56:38 | BUG #19465: Inconsistency in EXP(LN(x)) equivalence leading to different COUNT result in PostgreSQL |