Re: plan shape work

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexandra Wang <alexandra(dot)wang(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "bruce(at)momjian(dot)us" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: plan shape work
Date: 2025-09-26 02:26:16
Message-ID: CAMbWs4_+k+n8oDtfuJ0Q28ZWfUuf6fXS9oBwX-Ou-7K4LVAcGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

FWIW, I'm a bit concerned about the double for loop inside
choose_plan_name(), especially since the outer loop runs with a true
condition. Maybe I'm just worrying over nothing, as we probably don't
expect a large number of subroots in practice, but the nested loops
still make me a little uneasy.

- Richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-09-26 02:26:37 Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-09-26 02:05:15 Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals