| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimization issue of branching UNION ALL |
| Date: | 2022-12-22 02:37:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs49fj701dxtmo9A7e+Bu_aR1xyLNPL4dPG+W0cT43QKgyg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:50 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> > Superficial study revealed possibly unnecessary operations that could be
> > avoided:
> > 1. Walking across a query by calling substitute_phv_relids() even if
> > lastPHId shows that no one phv is presented.
>
> Yeah, we could do that, and it'd help some.
I noticed we also check 'parse->hasSubLinks' when we fix PHVs and
AppendRelInfos in pull_up_simple_subquery. I'm not sure why we have
this check. It seems not necessary.
In remove_result_refs, I don't think we need to check 'lastPHId' again
before calling substitute_phv_relids, since it has been checked a few
lines earlier.
Thanks
Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-12-22 02:38:50 | Re: [PATCH] random_normal function |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-12-22 02:31:25 | Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats |