Re: Wrong result from JSON constructor in a simple CASE

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong result from JSON constructor in a simple CASE
Date: 2026-09-14 08:18:00
Message-ID: CAMbWs495yc=AofX2Bw642D4QZFFKZ2Wwsaz==henG=RRc6EqOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 11:39 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001 is a bug fix and should be back-patched to v16 where JSON
> constructor was introduced. 0002 is a missed optimization so maybe we
> can leave it to master-only?

I've pushed 0001 and back-patched it to v16, and pushed 0002 to master
and v19 only.

- Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Geier 2026-09-14 08:38:53 Re: Reducing relcache memory usage: deduping index shapes
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2026-09-14 08:14:35 Re: Fix unnecessary shared memory page allocation in CalculateShmemSize()