| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug: var_is_nonnullable() gives wrong results for old/new in RETURNING |
| Date: | 2026-04-10 05:48:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48swa+F+HmsxnVqYrSvDFgp9v7ShSjac5FsG4oFFKvs2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 10:30 AM Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2026年4月10日周五 02:43写道:
> > It appears the optimizer incorrectly simplifies old.<col> IS NULL to FALSE in RETURNING clauses when the underlying column has a NOT NULL constraint.
> >
> > The issue is that var_is_nonnullable() in clauses.c doesn't check Var.varreturningtype. It sees a NOT NULL column and concludes the Var can never be NULL.
> > But this assumption is wrong for old.* and new.* references. Because the old tuple doesn't exist on INSERT, and the new tuple doesn't exist on DELETE
Nice catch.
> Yes, the current var_is_nonnullable() ignores this case. The
> attached patch seems ok to me.
The patch also LGTM. I also checked if has_notnull_forced_var() has
the same issue, but it doesn't: Vars with non-default returning type
only appear in the RETURNING clause, so they never show up in WHERE/ON
clauses.
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-04-10 05:53:15 | Fix pgstat_database.c to honor passed database OIDs |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-04-10 04:37:30 | Re: Fix typo in import_pg_statistic() comment |