| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: scary patch contest |
| Date: | 2026-08-26 00:58:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48qgiuCG72=ALhy_kva3tS_2XWemnmnSh0dZFJsaZCmig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 3:54 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> If we look back at previously released features, does anyone feel these
> PG 19 features received an unusualy high number of cleanup patches? And
> if so, are there more because of AI, as Melanie is asking?
Yeah, I feel the same way.
I expected that AI assistance would make new features more stable by
feature freeze, but it seems that that hasn't turned out to be the
case.
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-08-26 01:12:42 | Re: pg_plan_advice: fix empty FOREIGN_JOIN sublist validation |
| Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2026-08-26 00:21:35 | Re: Apply worker can pick an invalid index for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL lookups |