Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560
Date: 2026-09-19 14:05:51
Message-ID: CAMbWs48Vo7t2C6jH4aQHvFjkNAc=GCZMNyPY=G15rzw462keGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 4:15 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But I think it'd still be better to use "explain verbose", so at least
> what ruleutils prints is recorded. I'll make that change before push.

Also pushed this one.

- Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2026-09-19 14:21:22 Re: 64-bit MultiXactOffset vs. 9.3->9.4 upgrade, pg_resetwal, "wraparound" msg
Previous Message Nick Ivanov 2026-09-19 13:50:00 Re: Possible race condition in pg_basebackup