| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <rguo(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Ignore PlaceHolderVars when looking up statistics |
| Date: | 2026-01-05 00:52:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48T3yV--m+KLszRhG1UK7acXMX9Y_UYPNt0k35oPdoZ2A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 3, 2026 at 6:20 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Generally we don't back-patch fixes that could change plans, because
> > it tends to produce user complaints. It's maybe more justifiable in
> > this case because v18 is quite new and you didn't back-patch to older
> > releases, but are we sure that it's warranted even there?
> It's a regression if we don't.
That's right. I was actually of two minds for a while regarding the
back-patch, but in the end decided to proceed. You can find the
discussions and the reasoning behind this decision in the link below.
https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49h5F66KZwLxaeXoLwHe_9jAB7Eu44UmJhhQpLA38tKhw@mail.gmail.com
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-01-05 01:09:40 | Re: pgsql: Remove unneeded defines from pg_config.h.in |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-01-05 00:49:26 | Re: pgsql: Remove unneeded defines from pg_config.h.in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alastair Turner | 2026-01-05 01:03:51 | Proposal - Enabling btree_gist by default |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-01-05 00:46:15 | Re: Typos in the code and README |