| From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor> |
| Date: | 2026-04-21 01:12:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAMbWs48KEdgyJhxCOysaRdRJ5NzPObUET+5XbvyiqDfqyABEwg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 9:57 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 6:05 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Agreed that v4 is the better direction.
> Thanks for review!
Another question I'd like to raise: is it OK to commit this patch to
master given that feature freeze has passed? I think the answer is
yes, because this is arguably a bug fix rather than a new feature.
However, it does change user-visible behavior, and existing app code
that relies on the NULL behavior would break. So if we commit it, we
need to add in the release notes about this incompatibility.
Thoughts?
- Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-04-21 02:30:32 | Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor> |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2026-04-21 00:57:34 | Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor> |