Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560
Date: 2026-09-02 05:37:23
Message-ID: CAMbWs4-TLtaG8f8b3xgOb9zDOAvMdSC4aR0tv6iXm5crPDMEKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 12:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> v2 patch LGTM. I might say "incomplete" rather than "one-sided"
> in the commit message, but that's getting *really* nit-picky.

Thanks! I've updated the commit message to say "incomplete", and then
pushed and back-patched it to v16.

That leaves us with just the lateral PHV issue in this thread.

- Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-09-02 05:39:04 Re: Failing assertion while taking a restartpoint during crash recovery
Previous Message Richard Guo 2026-09-02 05:27:26 Re: foreign_key test is sensitive to the OID counter