Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2

From: Nicola Contu <nicola(dot)contu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ray O'Donnell" <ray(at)rodonnell(dot)ie>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alessandro Aste <Alessandro(dot)aste(at)gtt(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Performance comparison between Pgsql 10.5 and Pgsql 11.2
Date: 2019-03-04 16:01:09
Message-ID: CAMTZZh39S_miLXFXRTOGEa51e5ZJ6=r7U8DT5Cb_Ed3yUxQuxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Attached a part of the strace running the pgbench command for pg11
Also attached strace_10 for pg10.6.

Thanks

Il giorno lun 4 mar 2019 alle ore 15:22 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> ha
scritto:

> Nicola Contu <nicola(dot)contu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > See attached perf report. The difference seems to be all in this line,
> but
> > not sure :
> > + 26.80% 0.00% 222 postmaster [kernel.kallsyms]
> > [k] system_call_fastpath
>
> That would suggest that many more kernel calls are happening, which is
> something you could usefully investigate with strace, perhaps.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
strace.txt text/plain 64.4 KB
strace_10.txt text/plain 63.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eugen Stan 2019-03-04 16:42:40 Re: support for JSON Web Token
Previous Message Arthur Zakirov 2019-03-04 15:53:31 Re: query logging of prepared statements