| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | solai v <solai(dot)cdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boris Mironov <boris_mironov(at)outlook(dot)com>, Madyshev Egor <E(dot)Madyshev(at)ftdata(dot)ru>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Idea to enhance pgbench by more modes to generate data (multi-TXNs, UNNEST, COPY BINARY) |
| Date: | 2026-10-10 19:45:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAMT0RQT6ev3ONtHAuZ-YecdxPU3rjCF-upQtzJTA+PUch01-wA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
Please take a look at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/7387/ which
splits pgbench into functional modules so it would be easier to extend.
My aim is to re-base https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/7225/ on top
of that, and then add more useful things
Looks like I did not send the latest kleanup after Zsolt Parragi
<zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> has some comments, will do it soon,
after making sure th CI is still green
---
Hannu
On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 7:10 AM solai v <solai(dot)cdac(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> I reviewed and tested the latest v15 patch for the pgbench faster data
> generation modes.
> My testing results
> - Reproduced the existing behavior before applying the patch using '-I
> dtgG', where both client-side and server-side data generation were
> executed.
> - Applied the v15 patch successfully and built pgbench without errors.
> - Re-ran the same test after applying the patch.
> - After the patch, pgbench reports the warning: 'More than one type of
> data initialization is requested'.
> - Both requested initialization modes were still executed successfully.
> - The test completed successfully without errors.
>
> Is the warning for multiple data-generation modes already covered by
> the existing regression tests?
>
> Based on my testing, the patch works as expected for the tested scenario.
>
> Regards,
> solai
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2026-10-10 19:55:54 | Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-10-10 18:02:04 | Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions |