Re: Initdb-time block size specification

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Initdb-time block size specification
Date: 2023-09-05 21:38:28
Message-ID: CAMT0RQS8N9DFJewJ0B1GV38-3QqZoUvxJcnWQ_YoP3NSpK+j3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sure, I was just hoping that somebody already knew without needing to
specifically check :)

And as I see in David's response, the tests are actually broken for other sizes.

I'll see if I can (convince somebody to) set this up .

Cheers
Hannu

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 10:23 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-09-05 21:52:18 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Something I also asked at this years Unconference - Do we currently
> > have Build Farm animals testing with different page sizes ?
>
> You can check that yourself as easily as anybody else.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-09-05 21:49:55 Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-09-05 21:08:29 Re: Replace known_assigned_xids_lck by memory barrier