Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed

From: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dilip Kumar <dilipkumarb(at)google(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed
Date: 2026-09-21 20:01:18
Message-ID: CAMT0RQQi7=8uJyRjvhuRZ73VzU_CovYv=rRiw00kXzGeUC3KMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is there a way to make sure that it actually runs the same way?

The reason I have been sending it is that the tests do pass locally,
even the ones that fail in CI and I have been trying to figure out why

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 8:49 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2026-09-21 20:29:14 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > one more round
>
> Please just run CI on your own repo. Sending a patchset three times in a day,
> to thousands of people, just to see CI results, is ... not a scalable approach.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2026-09-21 20:11:41 Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-09-21 19:51:26 Adding a range check on the sequence index from the publisher.