| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: dumping tables data in multiple chunks in pg_dump |
| Date: | 2026-01-14 21:46:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAMT0RQQVSr6oQB0N2s0M_tENQzp-KLV-ze-sij7mHky7LTzHbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:40 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2026-01-14 11:52:54 +0100, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 3:32 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 at 09:34, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > Added to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6219/
> > >
> > > I see you added the "Backport" tag in the CF. This isn't the sort of
> > > thing that we'd do that for. Was that a mistake?
> >
> > Just wanted to mark it as something that might be backported later as
> > one of the important cases for pg_dump is dumping older databases .
>
> I think it's obvious that nothing that's being discussed here has any business
> being considered for backporting.
Do we have clear written guidelines about what can and can not be backported ?
And do we distinguish between the core database, extensions and tools for this?
> Nor can I follow the argument that dumping of old databases would be an
> argument, as the proposed change is in pg_dump, not the server, so a new
> pg_dump will suffice to get the benefit, no?
I was not sure if pg_restore is backwards compatible enough to be able
to restore from newer pg_dump versions.
----
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2026-01-14 21:49:57 | Re: libpq: Bump protocol version to version 3.2 at least until the first/second beta |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2026-01-14 21:43:39 | Re: libpq: Bump protocol version to version 3.2 at least until the first/second beta |