| From: | Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook |
| Date: | 2019-07-12 18:34:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAMN686GWGapWCFrVqRjHApUz9gZS=beSHCuUiZOPXmPrL54TKg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 4:25 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for jumping into this thread pretty late. I have read the
> messages on this thread a couple of times and...
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 3:05 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm on Peter's side. Unlike other similar hooks, this hook is
> > provided just to introduce arbitrary inconsistency in partition
> > pruning.
>
> ...I have questions about the patch as proposed, such as what Peter
> and Horiguchi-san might.
Thank you for taking a look at this. I need a bit of time to research
and affirm my previous assumptions, but will address all of these
points as soon as I can.
--
Mike Palmiotto
Software Engineer
Crunchy Data Solutions
https://crunchydata.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ryan Lambert | 2019-07-12 18:41:19 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |
| Previous Message | Nikita Glukhov | 2019-07-12 17:30:22 | Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree |