| From: | Ellen Allhatatlan <ellenallhatatlan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin <zzzzz(dot)graf(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MVCC and all that... |
| Date: | 2025-09-12 19:16:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAMLfE0Pev+Y-sahbjctNwZzLtiNOp5A8vy23j2MmiES-mc6g5A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
You, (Merlin Moncure) said:
> Technical discussions from the 80's are more or less historically interesting only.
I agree with your technical points - and the fact that I brought up "history".
I was replying to Justin in this context:
I wrote:
> AIUI, Michael Stonebraker suggested that the process model
> would/should be "upgraded" to a threaded one at some point in the
> system's developement?
To which Justin replied:
> I am going to need a source on this. Process vs Threads: pro and cons are very well documented and proven today.
Hence the history lesson - to provide the "source" from Michael Stonebraker
HTH.
> merlin
--
El!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-09-12 23:34:08 | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-09-12 16:32:33 | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |