Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2017-09-07 15:58:05
Message-ID: CAMGcDxfBkghqK94VZoOBE4XaOA9xZmkaM-opKeEzOrPmajVHBA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

FYI all, wanted to mention that I am working on an updated version of
the latest patch that I plan to submit to a later CF.

Regards,
Nikhils

On 14 May 2017 at 04:02, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 13 May 2017 at 22:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently you are not testing against current HEAD. That's been there
>> since d10c626de (a whole two days now ;-))
>
> Indeed, I was working on a more than two-day old antiquity. Unfortunately,
> it's even more complicated
> to apply this patch against the current HEAD, so I'll wait for a rebased
> version.

--
Nikhil Sontakke http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL/Postgres-XL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2017-09-07 15:58:31 Re: Secondary index access optimizations
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-07 15:33:09 Re: Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage