Re: Postgres vs other Postgres based MPP implementations

From: Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vs other Postgres based MPP implementations
Date: 2011-11-08 11:03:46
Message-ID: CAM6mieK2wwYPBLR0BuHccEMmAP8uFfCNNxo-ncbusmTYSj0JUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

2011/11/8 Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>:
> Sure you did - you've stated that "mostly heavy read
> workloads but OLTP performance is required (like run query over 100m+
> dataset in 15 sec)." That clearly mentions OLTP  ...

Whatever :) Let's make it clear: I need to run aggregates/roll
ups/drill downs on large dataset (100m+) but the query should return
result (less than 1000 rows, mostly around 100) under 30 sec

My point is that MPP (same box used) solution can deliver required
performance in most cases (>75%).

--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chrishelring 2011-11-08 11:33:20 IP range in pg_hba.conf?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-11-08 10:54:05 Re: Streaming Replication woes