Re: Postgres vs other Postgres based MPP implementations

From: Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vs other Postgres based MPP implementations
Date: 2011-11-08 21:46:05
Message-ID: CAM6mieJ2J6kO4LgNtZvDuN=nY3bjibURfPqpAEcKP_g_-ff1Xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

On 9 November 2011 04:53, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/08/11 1:49 AM, Ondrej Ivanič wrote:
>>
>> Greenplum or Postgres + Fusion IO can deliver this performance for us.
>
> then, thats your answer!   it ain't free, oh well.

FusionIO is little bit problematic: smaller card (2.4TB) has serious
scalability issues (not card but PG and card); bigger one can't fit
our server due to thermal restrictions. Anyway, both cards just do
scale. Geenplum DCA is on site already.

What I see is that single node Greenplum can utilise available
resources more efficiently...

--
Ondrej Ivanic
(ondrej(dot)ivanic(at)gmail(dot)com)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Prashant Bharucha 2011-11-08 21:49:18 Getting Error On pg_dump
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-11-08 21:11:58 Re: function within a function/rollbacks/exception handling