Re: pow support for pgbench

From: Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodriguez(at)carto(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: pow support for pgbench
Date: 2017-10-30 11:56:22
Message-ID: CAM6_UM67_GBF_8+ezJn6iEfXrwJVZHX_poeZY2cyerd_jfuZ=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

both patches seem complementary. I've rebased my changes on top of that
patch
(v14) in https://git.io/vFtnT and everything seems to be working fine.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> >> Please add this patch to the upcoming commit fest if you would like to
> >> get some feedback:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/
> >>
> >> I am adding as well Fabien in CC who worked in getting the internal
> >> function infrastructure in the shape it is now (waaay better) with
> >> commit 86c43f4.
> >
> > I think Raúl would do well to review this patch by Fabien
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/alpine.DEB.2.20.
> 1710201835390(dot)15170(at)lancre
> > which adds a few functions and operators.
>
> Good idea. pow() is not added by Fabien's patch, but an operator for
> pow() could be something to add as well.
> --
> Michael
>

--

*Raúl Marín Rodríguez*carto.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-10-30 11:57:50 Re: More stats about skipped vacuums
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-30 11:52:45 Re: How to implement a SP-GiST index as a extension module?