| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Date: | 2016-09-27 08:22:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTweYMrb7n8gai+LrXYL3cPwEQoH_bkJpxsXO0UP5A6Og@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Hmm, yeah, that'd be nice to fix. I'd like to see a patch specifically to
> fix that. I'm not convinced that we need all the complications of this
> patch, to get that fixed. (In particular, indexam's still wouldn't need to
> care about the different between CHECK_UNIQUE_PARTIAL and
> CHECK_UNIQUE_SPECULATIVE, I think.)
But you are convinced that everything else I describe would do it?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-09-27 08:25:01 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-09-27 08:10:28 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |