| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |
| Date: | 2015-12-01 22:15:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTomBs03eUQX2s-gJxDk3ZZ1+jjA61Tg=eu0t=NWCR4bw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm. I read Peter's message as agreeing with Andres rather than with
> you. And I have to say I agree with Andres as well. I think it's
> weird to back a commit out only to put a bunch of very similar stuff
> back in.
Your interpretation was correct. I think it's surprising to structure
things this way, especially since we haven't done things this way in
the past.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-01 23:11:21 | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-01 22:07:15 | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |