Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date: 2016-08-31 22:15:16
Message-ID: CAM3SWZToP8HdHcwe1=9TXkZbwFnyVOkyRJgTcgDnJ+u30BsUkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On August 31, 2016 3:06:23 PM PDT, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that
>>sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic
>>definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading
>>of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64
>>here, of course.
>
> Uh?

Sorry, I really should have not said anything. It is true that x86_64
word size is sometimes reported as 16 and/or 32 bits [1], because of
legacy issues.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_(computer_architecture)#Table_of_word_sizes
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2016-08-31 22:31:44 Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2016-08-31 22:12:57 Re: autonomous transactions