Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun
Date: 2013-10-22 17:45:27
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTo53wN5up1kv7Sa=DQC2yCBz1=8+x4LGkArte_EGgrdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> I may be missing something, but there are already plenty of b-tree specific
> flags. See BTP_* in nbtree.h. I'll just add another to that list.

Based on your remarks, I thought that you were intent on directly
using page level bits (pd_flags), rather than the private state flag
bits. Blame it on the lack of coffee, I suppose.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-22 17:56:52 Re: Reasons not to like asprintf
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-22 17:30:35 Re: Failure while inserting parent tuple to B-tree is not fun