Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2016-03-12 22:24:37
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTiND7bUkYXS4c7+VY+Ac5PCRZFouq8qZ5j5ExDdo4q4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch was reviewed during CF 2016-01 and has not been updated for
> CF 2016-03. I think we should mark it Returned with Feedback.

I have a full plate at the moment, Robert, both as a reviewer and as a
patch author. This patch is basically uncontroversial, and is built to
make the AM interface clearer, and the design of speculative insertion
easier to understand. It's clear we should have it. I'll get around to
revising it before too long.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-12 22:34:48 Re: OS X 10.11.3, psql, bus error 10, 9.5.1
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-03-12 21:42:54 Re: pam auth - add rhost item