Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel
Date: 2014-12-05 22:54:06
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTXVzMmJE4t1jL9ViORJ7e+o0vOW89MR0j_PXrOgOS3kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> Perhaps we should also officially recommend production servers be setup to
> create core files. AFAIK the only downside is the time it would take to
> write a core that's huge because of shared buffers

I don't think that's every going to be practical.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Frith-Macdonald 2014-12-05 23:02:55 Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2014-12-05 22:41:22 Re: Elusive segfault with 9.3.5 & query cancel