Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading
Date: 2016-09-11 22:34:17
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTQtbDBGV5w5CkxokrPivvRmALmc9HMCP4wbu1AouiqFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> * Please make this use the ".., + 1023" natural rounding trick that is
> used in the similar traces that are removed:
>
>> +#ifdef TRACE_SORT
>> + if (trace_sort)
>> + elog(LOG, "using %d kB of memory for read buffers in %d tapes, %d kB per tape",
>> + (int) (state->availMem / 1024), maxTapes, (int) (per_tape * BLCKSZ) / 1024);
>> +#endif

Also, please remove the int cast, and use INT64_FORMAT. Again, this
should match existing trace_sort traces concerning batch memory.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2016-09-11 22:56:46 Typo in filename identification
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-11 22:23:21 Re: Useless dependency assumption libxml2 -> libxslt in MSVC scripts