Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort
Date: 2015-04-02 23:02:59
Message-ID: CAM3SWZT5gCAHh3UaHP-0ryiMgJAdkXF1DWjOkgU9X9Qu5_pUmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The changes that Andrew
>> took issue with are utterly insignificant.
>
> Great. Then you will be utterly indifferent to which version gets committed.

*shrug*

You were the one that taught me to be bureaucratically minded about
keeping code consistent at this fine a level. I think it's odd that
you of all people are opposing me on this point, but whatever.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-02 23:08:13 Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-04-02 22:24:32 Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?