| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Date: | 2016-05-18 23:32:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZT0hC=nGa7m1-zDiAWhZgsz-=xVtC8LydDNhTKjZ=VLew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Since we were considering a new VACUUM option, surely this is serious
> enough to warrant more than just contrib.
I would like to see us consider the long-term best place for amcheck's
functionality at the same time. Ideally, verification would be a
somewhat generic operation, with AM-specific code invoked as
appropriate.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-05-19 05:38:48 | Re: foreign table batch inserts |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-05-18 22:57:49 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |