| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Date: | 2016-05-31 18:18:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSsH=a-+koge_xsNEewumE7CSgnas7MaVSQsekKC0GOTQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Changing the explain output doesn't sound so bad to me.
>
> The users' problem is that the parameter setting ought to match the EXPLAIN
> output.
>
> The developers' problem is that the EXPLAIN output actually corresponds to
> leader + (N-1) workers internally.
>
> I think we can hope that developers are going to be less confused about that
> than users.
+1.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-05-31 18:19:02 | Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-31 18:17:35 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |