| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Alton <thomas(dot)alton(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| Date: | 2016-05-23 23:15:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSiNQF5k=EVB9hE7WLa_P6FN+qBBAxn6qYy7rZXXswN_g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> And after further thought, I decided that that was penny-wise and
> pound-foolish; it's more readable if the #define is just an independent
> pg_config_manual.h entry. The only work it'd save is the need to update
> a buildfarm animal or two to add the new #define, which is not exactly
> a huge cost.
You also have to be aware of the new thing, which a lot of hackers
will not be, if awareness of COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES is anything to go
by.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 23:27:53 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 23:11:29 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 23:27:53 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-23 23:11:29 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14153: Unrecognized node type error when upsert is present in recursive CTE |