Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date: 2015-01-20 23:34:35
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSfpb_eT9Gwqdq+eT99nDNQ4DvVBSo=B+g5cRbeJEkAMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Peter, this made bowerbird (Windows 8/Visual Studio) build, but it's
> failing make check. Ditto hamerkop (Windows 2k8/VC++) and currawong
> (Windows XP Pro/MSVC++). jacana (Windows 8/gcc) and brolga (Windows
> XP Pro/cygwin) are unhappy too, although the failures are showing up
> in different build stages rather than in 'make check'. narwhal
> (Windows 2k3/mingw) and frogmouth (Windows XP Pro/gcc) are happy,
> though, so it's not affecting ALL of the Windows critters. Still, I'm
> leaning toward the view that we should disable this optimization
> across-the-board on Windows until somebody has time to do the legwork
> to figure out what it takes to make it work, and what makes it work on
> some of these critters and fail on others. We can't leave the
> buildfarm red for long periods of time.

Fair enough.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-20 23:34:49 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-01-20 23:34:18 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)