From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Date: | 2015-04-25 00:54:40 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZSOQ0YE5BwMjZT0neTk6n671h7Bi_YBHBA3PU4nLGU2ug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Peter Geoghegan (pg(at)heroku(dot)com) wrote:
>> I came up with something that is along the lines of what we discussed.
>> I'll wait for you to push Dean's code, and rebase on top of that
>> before submitting what I came up with. Maybe this can be rolled into
>> my next revision if I work through Andres' most recent feedback
>> without much delay.
>
> This is done (finally!). Please take a look and let me know if you have
> any questions or concerns. Happy to chat again also, of course.
Great, thanks.
I didn't actually wait for you (as earlier indicated) before posting
the new approach to RLS in V3.4. However, I have some decent tests for
the new behaviors (I did test-driven development), so I think that
when I rebase on top of the new RLS stuff tomorrow, I'll find that it
won't be too difficult.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-25 00:59:26 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-25 00:52:55 | Re: Row security violation error is misleading |