Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2016-03-19 05:00:22
Message-ID: CAM3SWZS4nbTn=Ji=MOx5ft7Y9d+49x62N0xGadYav0BjfATUZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:15 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> It looks like this patch should be marked "needs review" and I have done so.

Uh, no it shouldn't. I've posted an extensive review on the original
design thread. See CF entry:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/433/

Marked "Waiting on Author".

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Snow 2016-03-19 05:29:21 Re: oldest xmin is far in the past
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2016-03-19 04:59:01 logger process infinite loop