| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort |
| Date: | 2015-04-03 12:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZS07VKtrzNVAv5Nznf4o+DO-ovwoGEFmG7QWEwTSTp-ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm about as much
> of a stickler for the details as you will find on this mailing list,
> or possibly, in the observable universe, but even I'm not willing to
> expend the amount of ink and emotional energy you have on whether a
> variable that holds +1, 0, or -1 ought to be declared as "int" or
> "int32". Does it matter? Yeah. Is it worth this much argument? No.
I haven't really spent very much time arguing about this point at all,
and intend to spend no more time on it. It's up to you.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-03 12:17:18 | Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-03 12:07:04 | Re: Re: Abbreviated keys for Datum tuplesort |