Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?
Date: 2013-07-09 03:03:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRziLoS6t4g+bQur9Mc_zi02bK3iqd3hDRLNLOV=DO7RQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I don't think rewriting it in Perl is necessary or even desirable. I
> don't see anything particularly unportable in that script as it is.

I was under the impression that the final patch ought to work on
Windows too. However, I suppose that since the number of people that
use windows as an everyday development machine is probably zero, we
could reasonably forgo doing anything on that platform.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-07-09 04:09:23 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-07-09 02:59:07 Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?