Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Date: 2015-03-20 00:05:24
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRywTCK+9ERWsEmOmxXfVadBbD5NtSoUu4-ha4mBC7sMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> Nice fixes. Sorry about forgetting numericvar_to_int*.
>
> As for the reviewers those lists look pretty much correct. David Rowley
> should probably be added to the second patch for his early review and
> benchmarking.

This also seems fine to me.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Max Filippov 2015-03-20 00:14:48 configure can't detect proper pthread flags
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2015-03-19 23:49:07 Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates